Somewhere in my
reading I stumbled* upon the word: Doxology. Not that it was used in the
strictest^ sense, but it seemed to
frame my model of understanding. Not that
there** is a tangent or
parallel(n
or aster [
!]
?).
*yet to locate (1,2,4) latter inserts(5, 2, 6)
[
unre
lated
?]
** actually t
here may be !
[
Huff Po ? ! ? ]
^ 1-7-14 it seemed useful in the sense it
was used *** if I can find it.
*** from googled: theory of understanding (not it)
No comments:
Post a Comment